He transferred from Boise, was nearly a 4 star recruit for Boise (89 rating). He was from Rocklin.
Transferred at start of Gould era. Played in August and September 2013 making some starts, lost job again to Wright.

Sac may be chasing their tail, they may end up FBS, just in time for college football to divide into new tiers with new names, and the certainty is that Sac won’t be top tier, The top conferences want to split off, leaving the lessor conference, likely including the Mountain West and the Pac12, as the new “JVs”.

Wright was not the true freshman Scott Marsh says he was, he red shirted the prior year.
You can’t judge players by that type of mismatch. It will likely look similar when they play Washington,
Gould had all of those QBs his first year, he inherited Wright and Scott from Biggs. Scott was from Fairfield, not much recruiting interest, but Biggs liked him.

A big part of the decline in pro QBs coming from Davis is that in the 70s through first half of the 80s, a lot of college teams were run oriented, running the wishbone, veer and power I offenses, so few teams were developing Pro style QBs. Davis in that period was running elements of the Dallas Cowboys offense. That is the period when Davis had NFL drafted QBs.
Now everyone throws the ball a lot, the pro offenses have changed to be more like the college, and therefor the majority of collleges are developing pro QB skills. Add to that the better scouting of HS players by the major colleges, which don’t just scoop up the NFL prospects at QB, but at all positions, as shown by how few FCS or D2 players get drafted at any position.

Sac has had 4 three star recruits decommit since 6/25 according to 247sports and a 5th without stars but with multiple offers.
https://247sports.com/college/sacramento-state/Season/2026-Football/Decommits/

This conversation going over QBs of the last 50 years, and just scratching the surface, would be impossible at most schools. My time at Davis the QBs were Biggs and Speck. I wish i could see a program from that era. If I recall correctly, on Biggs’ Boardwalk Bowl team, one offensive lineman weighed about 210 or 215 lbs and trained by swimming, rather than weights. When playing teams like Massachusetts and Boise that lack if size largely precluded running the ball but the QB put up big numbers.Speck threw for over 400 yards against Boise, and Davis lost a close one simply because they couldn’t get a pass rush against a line that was near 300lbs. I think the Boise QB went on to play in Canada. Davis vs Goliath games.

Highest ranked Davis recruit ever according to 247sports site, and one of two 2026 recruits in the top four.
I’m not counting Jalen Harris, who never enrolled.

icy baby blue is an in color for 2025.
apparel vendors design accordingly. Tahoe provides the ostensible reason to issue in fashion apparel.

I was surprised last year to find that 247sports only used “composite ranking” of recruits in ranking signing classes. This limitation results in wildly inaccurate rankings of classes, as it ignores the effect of recruiting a large number of players that 247sports own ranking system ranked highly.
Last year our class had 3 players with “composite ranking” (Cofield, Knoos, Parker, bet you didn’t know those were the only recruits that counted)
In 2026 we already have seven. ( Honebein,,Vercher, Fay, Beverly, Brant, Blocker) and just added McGeilberry)
To what do we attribute this change? Could be the ranking entities are ranking more players, or it could be that were getting commitments from players that have higher profiles. Unless this is a global change affecting other teams classes, Davis will have a higher ranking class in 2026, just based on players committed so far.

Not a lawyer and maybe it is an up hill battle. But I think the NCAA needs a better argument against Sac going FBS than that the two conferences in the region haven’t invited them. That looks like restricting competition. Maybe there are other reasons. Sac argues that that requirement was waived for other schools, like Liberty, so argue the rule is unevenly applied.

It is odd that the focus of moving up seems to be on how the football team performs, when I suspect the conferences have expressed other concerns, and rather than addressing those concerns, whatever they are, Sac doubles down on proving the football team is good. Short of winning a national championship can’t prove anything new at the FCS level, with this years weak schedule.

Marion is a coach, given authority to act and goodies to disburse as if he was at Nevada Las Vegas or Texas, so he does. I don’t know that that shows bad character or dishonesty.
Woods is a pitchman, with the ethics of the marketplace, selling a vision unlikely to come to fruition as a sure thing. Buyer beware.

The difficulty in making Marion the scapegoat is that Sac’s football record is not what makes them unattractive to conferences. Sac had impressive recent success in football. They had a nineteen game conference win streak just a few years ago, had a winning record in 2023 including a win at Stanford and conferences weren’t and aren’t after them to join.

The FCS scholarship limit is the same as FBS scholarship limit for teams that opt into the House settlement, i.e. unlimited. Replaced by a roster limit of 105. There is a Big Sky Conference limit of 63 but i doubt they have an enforcement arm.
The litigation will be whether Sac pays the amount of NIL money promised.and there will likely be litigation of Sac suing the NCAA.

Most kids are still looking to get an education and have a good experience. Most will not get offered big bucks. The free education is still the largest reward schools are offering to the large majority of athletes, and many recruits still value the education and experience. There is a subset of kids that don’t value that, and will treat college like semi pro, and attend colleges that provide the most cash and the least education, the later approach will work for some and fail others.

Denying their waiver at least gives the players some goal for the season, if some are seeking something beyond polishing their resume for the portal.

Do you think FCS or FBS is the driver for recruits? Many had established FBS teams that they passed over, teams that are immediately eligible for the famous potato bowl or other high profile showcases, whereas Sac isn’t eligible for bowls once they get their transition started. I think they had other incentives.

About half of Sacs transfers are seniors, FBS or FCS makes no difference to them.
My question is whether they will want to play in the playoffs games without a bonus.

Look at prior years and you’ll see the same thing. This is from 2024 class

- DL Rayne Mayo Jr. *** 6'3 285 Valley Christian High School (San Jose, CA) Tweet
Offers: Air Force, Army, Bryant, Colgate, Columbia, Cornell, Idaho, Murray State, Navy, Portland State, Sacramento State, UC Davis, Utah State, Weber State
- LB Kyle Hill 6'5 220 *** Xavier College Prep High School (Palm Desert, CA) Tweet
Offers: Army, Fresno State, Montana, San Jose State, UC Davis
- OL David Porotesano *** 6'5 280 Oceanside High School (Oceanside, CA) Tweet
Offers: Adams State, Army, Brown, Bucknell, Cal Poly. Columbia, Idaho State, NAU, San Diego State, Southern Utah, UC Davis, Weber State, Wyoming
- OL Jezniah Thurston *** 6'4 274 Citrus Valley High School (Redlands, CA) Tweet
Offers: Cal Poly, Eastern Washington, Georgetown, Northern Arizona, San Jose State, UC Davis, Utah Tech, Weber State
- QB Damon Wrighster *** 6'3 185 Inglewood High School (Inglewood, CA) Tweet
Offers: Arizona, Florida Atlantic, Fordham, Grambling State, Liberty, Memphis, Middle Tennessee State, Nevada, Old Dominion, San Jose State, UC Davis, Yale
- RB Carter Vargas *** 6'0 200 St. Joseph High School (Santa Maria, CA) Tweet
Offers: Army, Boston College, Nevada, Northern Colorado, Pennsylvania, Princeton, UAB, UC Davis

This analyst says he looks mostly at upperclassmen. He devalues them if they haven’t put up statistics.
Since Davis lists players who were recruited here out of high school by academic year, red shirt sophomores are listed as juniors. (Oddly, Caden Pinnick is listed as a redshirt freshmen, while all his classmates are sophomores)
Jordan Fisher, Sam Goligoski, Trent Carrade, Izaiah Souriolle are examples are guys that got a chance to tiptoe into playing last year as redshirt freshmen. They didn’t generate stats because they didn’t get much of a chance as Davis had a veteran team, yet they are listed as juniors, whereas on most rosters they would be listed as red shirt sophomores.

Scott mentions a lot of holes on defense, but not mentioned was that the defense has added quality transfers.
One of the interesting stories of this years team is that there may be as many as six or seven experienced new faces on D, including 3 players who were all conference at the FCS level, and 3 FBS transfers who played a lot at that level.