Comments

  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State

    Sac with 20 sacks now trails Montana (21) in conference game sacks. Tied for third are Davis and Idaho State with 18.
  • 2025 FCS Playoff Prognostication

    #5 Tarleton going to overtime Austin Peay
    They won
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    I think the interception and end last play defense was Ty Richardsson
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    Riddick was great, on Sacs last drive He has my vote for defensive player of game. Lots of competition for that.

    The live stats show 63 out of 69 tackles were solo.
  • Facilities Master Plan Release

    The argument that they need to attract out of state students because California students are going out of state, which seemed logical for the interviewer, suffers when one considers how many California students aren’t offered admission.
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    Most of those events you cite don’t involve a hard stop from the facility or pilots.
    Davis Mercer was an hour and a half rain delay.
    In 2023 Mercer played in the same stadium and had a 76 minute delay. Not an unforeseeable act of god.
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    At least you finish the game. Davis did fine against Tulsa
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State

    The Mercer game was a learning experience, and the lesson should be don’t take night games in the South in August. They had only a five hour window to get the game in, and apparently that wasn’t considered prior to the rain delay.
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State

    The Stetson game was scheduled before Sac left the Big Sky. I think they would have to pay Stetson to get out of that game.
    Sac may identify as an FBS independent but that is aspirational. I guess the NCAA can revisit, but nothing has changed.
  • 2025 FCS Playoff Prognostication
    The Sac media teams release refers to a computer rating as a poll.
    I know its common to call them polls, but that obscures an important distinction.. Sac is 19th as rated by their performance in scoring and yielding points, the location of the games, and strength of schedule. Davis is ninth. These ratings basically look backward to estimate what rating would explain the team’s results against its schedule
    The polls on the otherhand are subjective opinions, by people that don’t have a common idea of what they are voting for. Are they rewarding accomplishment or predicting future results? Different voters would answer differently.
    Davis emphasizing their injuries is reflected by the polls, the computer doesn’t factor that in.
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    Davis is simply responding to the reality that if Sac isn’t part of the conference they are just another team. I’d personally prefer that Davis schedule one beatable FBS team, which is what Sac aspires to be, and skip the P4 games but there are other priorities, like payout and exposure in other markets. A home and home would help finance Sac more than it helps Davis because Sac has more seats. Davis isn’t obligated to make Sac’s schedule more attractive.
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State

    Sac isn’t ranked in the polls. They are 19 in Massey rating. Its conceivable Sac will be ranked by the Commitee, but only if they beat Davis.
  • Big Sky Football Games Week 12

    I think the Big Sky’s statement of “incorrect judgement” applied indicates that the officials had a good enough view to have made the correct call.
    Even the former Sac State coach doing the color on the broadcast questioned whether the right foot was down out of bounds.
    The call was internally inconsistent, they said he was in bounds based on his upper body landing in bounds, but then stopped the clock because he got out of bounds.
  • Big Sky Football Games Week 12
    DB pulled receivers upper body back onto the field. That made a routine call something to think about.
  • 2025 FCS Playoff Prognostication

    The Committee doesn't vote the rankings published this week.
    There are a bunch of two loss teams, and voters are swayed by record. I think all the publicity about injuries is swaying voters.
  • UC Davis @ Montana State

    There are reasons to be both optimistic and pessimistic about transfers and recruits, we’ll have to see how that works out. All FCS teams, and Mountain West teams are going to lose players to transfers. Idaho is an example where they were confident that they could continue to lose talent year after year but it caught up to them.
    Davis had 17 three star recruits in 2025 in CA Forever’s list, Some of those guys may have been over rated, but some haven’t had a chance or were injured, we don’t know why many of those guys never saw the field, The best way to prepare for losing players is to build depth. Davis only felt they had 55 players they felt worth taking to Bozeman.
  • UC Davis @ Montana State

    Regarding players who may burn a year by playing in the next game or the next two games, freshmen who have played in 3 or 4 games so far are Cory McEnroe, Brayden Ross, and Mason Walsh. Cory and Brayden have appeared in 4 games, Walsh 3. These guys have played on special teams, but in addition Cory appears on the depth chart behind Rutchena.
  • WEEK 11: UC Davis @ Idaho
    You must be right or else he'd be listed on the depth chart of this weeks game
  • WEEK 11: UC Davis @ Idaho
    He did! First game since Cal Poly.
    After hearing all through the oreseason that Davis was returning all offensive line starters, idaho was only the second game that they all played.
  • Injuries

    Early in the season they just listed everyone on the D line
    Ike Ikegbu made an appearance against Idaho

Riveraggie

Start FollowingSend a Message