Oregon reportedly offered him as a transfer. He was a sought after HS recruit class of 24., Would have been a top recruit for Davis. He could easily end up the number 2 back.

Teams need a logo for a lot of uses and the CA logo is a good one and it ties to our nick name of Aggies and script Davis doesn’t.
Put the script Davis on the uniforms in place of UC Davis, drop UC, it puts the school at the bottom of alphabetical lists. Everyone claims to be a university but they don’t all squeeze it into their name. Just redundant.

An aggiepridepodcast subscription is required for this episode. Its only available on spotify so far.. Unfortunately i set my authentication for the spotify account associated with the aggie pride subscription to use an apple digital keychain so I can’t try another non-apple device.

The new Aggie Pride podcast says they “hope” to fix it this evening.
It does require a subscription. The only device i have associated with the subscription is an iphone.

Same here as far as playing today’s podcast on spotify, gets error when loading

The new episode only is listed on Spotify. The aggiepridepodcast.com, youtube, apple podcast don’t list the newest one.

Eli Simonson started the first college game he ever appeared in, he never saw action at Nebraska. You might say he redshirted elsewhere, but I think you meant they needed a year in the system, or played at this level or higher. Going back a few years Jake Parks started as a true freshman here.

[ or an inside linebacker.

This years transfers are all underclassmen, quite a change from recent years. The two FCS transfers have significant playing experience, the FBS transfers are redshirt freshmen. The tight end from Cal was one of Davis’ offers in 2025.
Correction,: Hayden John is a senior. He never redshirted and played in five games one year.

Minnesota is on the semester system. I suspect he’ll be here.

St.John Bosco grad, going to be a sophomore. Had an offer from Oregon a week ago.

The rule applies to all sports, including sports prone to rainouts. The rationality as detailed back in the early 2000s is that if they didn’t count games that were not completed, it would mean the total number of games would not be known until the end of the season. Therefor the number of games a player could participate in would also be unknown until the season ended. A late season rainout could be unfair and cost an athlete a hardship waiver. My point is that the rule is not arbitrary and seeks a balance of fairness. Whatever the rule is someone is going to be on the wrong side of it.

L The Trinidad case is whether in 2022 he had a season ending injury. They don’t have much contemporaneous documentation about the illness or injury. But they can argue that the illness meets the rule requirement.
On the other hand, the Connors case doesn’t meet the conditions for a hardship because the rule says “scheduled games” not completed games, The Mercer game was a scheduled game. The NCAA has defined what a scheduled game is and a scheduled game does not need to be completed to count as such. They need the court to find the rule unfair and void it, not just decide whether someone suffered a season ending injury. I imagine thats a bigger challenge.

Buchanan met all the athleticism measurables, was productive his whole career, had 114 tackles at Cal. What he was deprecated on were subjective evaluations by so called draft experts, who embarrassed themselves.

Rainouts are relatively common in baseball for example. The NCAA made the intentional change to the language “scheduled games” so that there wasn’t uncerainty about whether an athlete would qualify for a hardship pending completion of all games. Otherwise a rainout or two late in the season could preclude getting a hardship waiver.(by changing the denominator for the 30% calculation)

You get to seven by Covid.year(2020).+ Redshirt year + 4 years playing + medjcal hardship. You get to 8 if you went to a non NCAA school and your eligibility was otherwise expiring last year. So someone could have started college in 2018 and still be eligible last year if things lined up right.

The transfers listed all played except Henry Fanua. O line was one of the deeper positions laat year.

Well good news regardless.
How does an organization publish a signing day article, and two rosters over the course of a year and not catch something like that? They make roster errors so often they should ask the players to proof read their bios since the sports information department doesn't have a clue who these student athletes are.

That is great news. This will be Richardson's fourth year in college overall, he never redshirted. He graduated from Tufts in less than two years because he was here in time for Spring practice last year. Does anyone know what graduate program he is participating in?

You are missing the authority to make rules. You, in your role as rule maker, need legislation restoring authority to the rule making body, and limiting courts jurisdiction . Otherwise courts will decide if non NCAA seasons count, if scheduled games mean games on the schedule, completed or not, etc. There needs to be legislation. Courts don't consider what is best for the college football universe, they decide if the rule making body has the authority to deprive someone from earning money, and they have been deciding it doesn't..

Most don't get a BS degree.
The difference between UC and CSU is not mostly in the science classes, it's that credit can be earned for less academic courses. If you peruse a junior college catalogue you'll see that there are a bunch of classes that will earn CSU credit but not UC credit If someone transfers from a CSU to a UC they are likely to lose credits.
I've taken slightly more classes at CSU, some at the graduate level in computer science, so I'm not denigrating your coworkers. I do believe there is not as much of a difference between systems as there was when i was a student.