Didn’t Roman mention me? Without laughing?

No sign of Spencer all game, correct? Even in first and goal from short

This was much easier than I expected. Their penalties hurt and that early turnover also. Losing their QB ended any chance.

So is Doss the best Aggie WR EVER?

Oddly enough they’ve outgained us in first half. That long drive got them three. Fumble gave us short field. Need d to regroup since they get kickoff. Keep it three score game as long as possible

I purposely excluded Dunnigan due to the closing of Bill and Kathy’s. The loss of such an icon can bode well for our quest. First the
Milk tree then Mr B’s and now Bill and Kathy’s

best i can tell, multiple voting is allowed (encouraged?). facebook post said limited to once/hour.

we'd have to win the tournament to get a NCAA bid, correct? we haven't been in for quite some time (2008 if not mistaken).

currently 521 vs. 275. let's not 'pull a Poly' and rest on the victory. vote a few more times.

I sorta had it on while watching the world series, and didn't hear anything about the upcoming game. a little bit of post-poly talk, mostly about getting everyone calmed back down post-rivalry so that they can focus on the home stretch. the show is always entertaining, whether its Dan and Kelly just talking, or Dan interviewing another coach, or listening to one of the players. i haven't heard the KSAC version -> i'm assuming they don't have the sound issues we get on Facebook Live.

feel free to forward that the Davis Enterprise!

maybe someone should send in a question via Facebook during the coach's show tonight. i doubt they would address an individual player, but who knows.

when the whole conference reshuffling game was being played out several years back, i'm guessing a very basic weighting system was used in determining potential additions :

(potential revenues) >>>>>>>>>> (academic ranking)

Pac 12 guy #1 : so, should we add Texas or UC-Davis? Texas is synonymous with football, draws 100,000 per game, would move our footprint into football rabid Texas, and they have the resources to pay us a boatload of money to join. What does Davis bring to the table?

Pac 12 guy #2 : they are the #6 ranked public school in some magazine's survey. They have an adorable dog that gets the kicking tee. The Dixon-Rio Vista corridor is an untapped TV market. Granted, they have a 10000 seat stadium, and would have to move up from FCS....and the local 'major' TV market doesn't realize they play someone besides Sac State..but.....did i mention their academics?

Other Pac 12 guys : Texas it is, and get #2 out of the room.

there's one other requirement. a conference that wants us! why would the Pac-12 want to add 2 more teams (they are not gonna be the Pac 13) and if they were, they'd head into Texas for big money. We'd have to buy in, and probably buy out of our current conferences. Mountain West? Again, us and who else, because conferences want to have a balanced number to make two equal-numbered divisions? If the MWC lost teams, and needed teams to get to the minimum for two divisions (i think its 12) so they can have a championship game, made. else, no. to be honest, Sac is probably more attractive and they have a stadium that meets the minimum. I would think the Sac Metro area has bigger TV numbers than the greater Dixon-Woodland Metroplex.

and, there's the Tittle IX stuff. add more football scholarships and either add the same for women's, or drop a men's sport.

ain't gonna happen. there is no way a California school will make the transition up. just too expensive, and no suitable conference to jump into.

they mentioned South Alabama in the comments to the article. they had a stadium in place (old, but meets requirements). they are in a rabid football area and had resources (remember they showed up with a Semi with their logo?). they had a conference (a weak one, but a conference) who wanted them.

nope, that was my point in us being 'ranked' ahead of Sac. that SUU win is pretty impressive based on the Thunderbirds' victories over Weber and EWU (and their 12 ranking). our best wins are decisive wins over #45 USD and #61 UND. ISU would be another good win along those lines, especially on the road. SUU would be the signature.

i'm surprised Sac isn't higher based on their convincing win over SUU. They have the same BSU losses as us, but a 'signature' win.

The sideline dance was a horrible look. Thrilling win that shouldn’t have been that close. Give poly credits, coaches and kids. They made adjustments ( completely took away Preece), stuck with their run game and didn’t give up. They got killed by three of their mistakes : 1) fumble before half cost them three or seven points; 2) hold on last punt cost them ten yards and left them out of FG position; 3) dropped pass on last play. But it’s a win.

In retrospect a FG instead on going for it on the one would have iced it BUT shouldn’t give up a 99 yard drive. Thought that penalty was ticky tack for that situation. Wasn’t egregious enough to make a game changing call.

Run game was non existent against poly’s front four - let their backers drop into pass lanes to take away pass option. Only one fly and that went for a loss. I’d like to see some fakes off the fly to keep d honest.

Aggie pack did get loud at end but they need leaders. Football isn’t part of many of our students background so they need someone on a mic to teach and lead. That being said best atmosphere in stadium in many years.

Beat the bengals and let’s see what happens down the stretch

wow......near radio silence on the boards heading into the Poly game. Hopefully the Ags don't carry the NAU loss like we are in here. Don't let one team beat you twice.

When diss won he had something like 4000 votes. Not much interest in the poll this week. I don’t think I can vote 100 more times before I go to bed!

He has less than 300 votes. AST falling asleep this week?

I have the west coast bias going. Modise and the San Diego QB