Comments

  • 2024 Week 3: UC Davis (1-1) @ Southern Utah (1-1)
    I don’t think Tompkins has even had a touch yet no?

    The shovel pass is new and yeah we had a truck play but still not much in the way of sweeps, gadgetry, anything that would get playmakers the ball in the Hawkins era
  • 2024 Week 3: UC Davis (1-1) @ Southern Utah (1-1)
    On the contrary, this gives me a lot of 2017 and 2019 vibes
  • 2024 Week 3: UC Davis (1-1) @ Southern Utah (1-1)
    My weekly rant that if we’re going to have among the strictest academic requirements in the FCS then the expectation should be we have among the least penalties in the FCS. We’re not going to win on athleticism so we have to have precision
  • 2024 Week 3: UC Davis (1-1) @ Southern Utah (1-1)
    It’s ok makes it more exciting to spot them 7
  • 2024 Week 2: Texas A&M Commerce (0-1) @ UC Davis (0-1)
    Offense might marginally improve just with Tompkins healthy and all else equal …. But that’s if MH can hit him in a forward pass because we’re not doing really any sweeps, pitches, direct snaps etc to get playmakers the ball.

    Relatedly, going to harp again that I hope the staff considers bringing back the wildcat package for the Red zone. Ungainly, predictable, but got the ball in 50% of the time at least
  • 2024 Week 2: Texas A&M Commerce (0-1) @ UC Davis (0-1)
    On the remaining schedule, Idaho, SUU, MSU, and Montana all have wins over FBS or FBS transitioning teams. Offense can’t execute like this vs the big hitters later
  • 2024 Week 2: Texas A&M Commerce (0-1) @ UC Davis (0-1)
    I wonder if it’s just pressure/ nerves? Maybe he’s just lights out in practice but just overthinks things in games or something
  • 2024 Week 2: Texas A&M Commerce (0-1) @ UC Davis (0-1)
    Scott said the inner thoughts out loud
  • 2024 Week 2: Texas A&M Commerce (0-1) @ UC Davis (0-1)
    As predictable as Hawkins’ wildcat red zone package was, it also was mildly successful against FCS defenses.

    I feel like just having ten guys block for Lan or TT can’t be less one dimensional than this
  • Other Games, 2024
    I'm predicting a two-possession loss to the Beavers, but I hope to be surprised. It's a rebuilding year IMO
  • 2024 Week 2: Texas A&M Commerce (0-1) @ UC Davis (0-1)
    UCD offense performed comparably and arguably even slightly better than Auburn's against Cal -- would have been more obviously reflected on in the score without the missed kicks
  • 2024 Big Sky Scores
    Four of the teams on our schedule now have an FBS win (counting Cal, and Montana beating a transitioning team). Every win will be critical this year for a playoff push
  • Other Games, 2024
    and pressured the QB on a would-be int that got negated by PI. He's game-changing out there
  • 2024 Week 2: Texas A&M Commerce (0-1) @ UC Davis (0-1)
    Speaking as an SDSU fan, they’re in basically full rebuild with a new system and apparently freshman QB. They also haven’t had a decent offense in the better part of a decade. That was a prime setup for an FCS scare.

    Maybe A&MC might move the ball marginally better vs the Aggie D but like others have noted we should both get going on the ground and have a bit of a better attack through the air than SDSU did at first
  • 2024 Week 2: Texas A&M Commerce (0-1) @ UC Davis (0-1)
    I'd agree we're more likely than not to get in at 8-4 but thinking about it more I'm cynical enough to want a buffer of at least one more win if possible. I'm remembering last year the argument for Davis making the field was essentially also a serious case for Sac to get left out at 8 wins including an FBS win.

    FWIW, I poked around Sac's schedule and they could potentially pose another bid-stealing situation with us because even with two FBS opponents they have a very good chance of heading into Causeway Week with 7 or 8 wins.

    A scary scenario would be having 8 wins coming into Causeway, Sac having 7 with a loss to Weber, and then them picking up the Causeway win -- Sac would then have not-much-worse losses, fewer FCS losses, and H2H over us on selection day. Not to mention Weber has a chance to build a resume with that scenario.

    In other words, we almost have to treat @Sac as do-or-die as well depending on what their record is looking like in the last few weeks
  • 2024 Week 2: Texas A&M Commerce (0-1) @ UC Davis (0-1)
    Based on the playoff committee's creativity last year, basically every game not against the current Massey top 15 is do-or-die now -- and everyone needs to stay healthy enough to squeeze two wins out of Idaho/EWU/UM/MSU/Sac.

    Hoping for a confidence-builder game from Hastings, LL to burst for some long runs, and a comfortable lead so that the starters get rest in the 4th. And I'm just simply excited to see what the defense does against FCS offenses now.
  • 2024 Week 1: UC Davis @ UC Berkeley
    We had these stretches in 2018 and 19 too where we went away from the quick passing game and just kinda stalled. I understand needing to keep the defense on their toes and that we're not expecting Hastings to throw bombs every other play, but the short/mid passing game was working
  • 2024 Week 1: UC Davis @ UC Berkeley
    Not a football expert but really disliking the halfback handoffs out of shotgun up the middle.
    a) hasn't worked all game
    b) didn't work particularly well when Plough was here last time
    c) primary goal of this game is for LL to walk away healthy
  • 2024 Week 1: UC Davis @ UC Berkeley
    Is it my imagination or are most of LL's touches just dives up the middle? Not much effort to to get any sweeps or pitches outside going?

    I remember that was my frustration with Plough's offense in 2019, though Larison should be more successful against FCS defenses than a younger and smaller Gilliam