There was an OOC game in 2012 where Hawkins had 30 and Sypkens had 28, is the closest I could come up with with some hasty Googling. Which just speaks to how crazy an accomplishment it is -- we're talking about two of the best shooters in school history having near-career nights on the same night, and even they couldn't get 60 between them.

TY when he’s in clutch time looks as prolific as any guard I’ve seen in the Aggie uniform. Also really nice to have our two go to guys also be solid at the free throw line, Pepper and Johnson both are just very good at taking whatever the defense gives them

Seemed like the Aggies were visibly frustrated in the second half with the physicality, reffing, and stars getting largely shut down for a bit. But that was a very good final minute of regulation + OT where Johnson and Pepper got in a groove.

Question for the board, what's the conventional wisdom on the final three seconds of regulation when the game was tied? Pepper got a rebound and made a move to drive down the court to the basket, but Johnson called a timeout with 2.6 seconds in order for Les to draw up a play, and I saw them exchanging some words after. My instinct would be that it's better to let the play run out because there's a chance the dribbler can get an open look or get fouled in transition, whereas on an inbound on the opposing court there are multiple ways to lose the ball in the final seconds. Is a chance for a timeout and the coach to call a play really that beneficial there?

I forgot we had a whole year with Lemar, Schneider, and Moneke starting (really shouldn't since that's the March Madness year), but it would make sense that some of the Ags' best multiple-scoring-threats games would be in that era

Probably some game where Corey Hawkins got 28 while Tyler Les and Josh Richart each hit minimum 5 threes as the Ags scraped by a .500 team in overtime. That’s what the whole 2015 roller coaster felt like anyway

My understanding from a brief read of some blogs and a general understanding of Davis aid is that students on partials are eligible for scholarships that the general public can apply for and Davis is almost unique among the non Ivy FCS schools in how robust the aid program is.

So I think what Hawkins meant by that is that they’re scoping out which recruits are in income brackets that would result in things like guaranteed grants to cover tuition and then giving them partials to just cover room and board, that kind of thing. Also perhaps even declining to give certain recruits scholarships if they’re eligible for almost everything covered anyway

$60k is better than a starting state job, which I suppose is the bar that you have to minimum beat for a professional job in this area. I wonder if "commensurate with experience" means they're willing to go up another 10k or more to actually bring someone in from another program, rather than promote a grad assistant or hire a graduating player.

Also noticed he put out a UC Davis mug conspicuously facing the camera for his recent Purdy video

I still think Daft or someone not mentioned yet are more likely, but this is a more fun route of speculation

Didn’t think about JT as a possibility, but it makes sense. I know he was a college athletics administrator for a while (I saw him raise an eyebrow at my Davis shirt in passing at SDSU) and now he’s got the pedigree of that excellent analysis series.

I did see he tweeted at Plough if we want to get very sleuthy about this

thank you for the hard hitting journalism, that was what I was hoping someone would ask

Did he just let slip that there’s a new OC? Said in the Fox 40 interview that there’s an OC with Aggie ties he can’t name but is excited for.

I’ll echo the hope someone else posted that Mike Cody still remains working with the line or run game in some capacity

Just looked something up: despite only technically having one winning season as OC under Hawkins, Plough had a top 15 offensive rating in Massey each year, even after Doss graduated. Bodes well for the second Shredville era, especially if some of the key skill players stay.

Watching LL pound the rock against a top 10 team when literally everyone in the stadium knew it was coming was a sight to behold, one of the greatest "big boy football" moments I can remember as an Aggie fan -- along with Maier and friends picking apart Montana at Wa-Griz and the Tulsa game.

Regarding draft prospects for LL vs UG -- Larison has two inches and ten pounds on Gilliam if random draft websites are to be believed, plus has notched a higher yards per carry each of the last two years than any single year in Gilliam's career. More yards per catch too. To be clear I'm not saying that Larison is a better college RB than Gilliam, but I can see why NFL scouts would be more willing to take a chance with him.

Speaking of, to give credit where it's due, the production quality has quietly improved to a more or less passable level from what I've seen of the home broadcasts.

I watched some of the first quarter on replay afterwards, and unless there were streaming problems with it live, it looked relatively professional from what I saw. A far cry from the audio and visual problems I remember from ~7 years ago.

Gotta start putting Pioneer teams and Utah Tech / TA&MC on the schedule every year. Committee just does not care about our conference record it seems.

Starting to think the committee would have found a way to exclude Davis in 2021 had we not upset a Tulsa team that we didn't predict would have an army of players suspended

I feel like I could construct an argument that it's no big deal that Davis relies on an individual's talent that much. We can't go shopping in the portal like other schools in the field can. Occasionally some skill players of insane talent who also have the grades like LL, Doss, Gilliam, Manzanares back in the day, etc take an interest in what our program has to offer and pretty much by necessity the ball ends up going to them most plays.

2022 Committee: “No you’re putting way too much focus on SOS and quality losses, the most important thing is to get to 7 wins with at least a good win in there”

2023 Ags: “OK”

2023 Committee: “No not like that”

Weber is only up 6 per the last Google update, not as close as I would like since they’re our only chance at claiming another win against a team with a winning record

Turnout is good for a normal day, great for a rain game

NAU and Weber are putting in work to make our prior schedule seem more respectable going into Causeway week.

At least Weber is going to (likely) finish above .500. I'm still thinking/hoping that next Sat is essentially a playoff audition.