I think almost everyone does that these days. They do it at NC State. Personally I find it sort of annoying after hearing it ad infinitum whether you are a home team fan or not.

Also, noticed that NC State has a tee retrieving dog. I had to tell my daughter and son-in-law that the idea was stolen from Davis that started it circa 15 years? ago.

LOL. Competing with, and/or trying to be Stanford fans?

As a former Band-uh member from way back and from only gathering from what I can hear on radio tv, the band-uh was much better for game experience. Constant cheering and yells and energy. We went to all away games and were the primary cheer section at those (of - Far Western Conference if anyone embers). We were small in number but could play pretty dang loud. BTW, our uniforms were much classier and better. Satin back with CA for color flashes. What is with the new weird blue color?

What I see now on tv is sort of like a social event in which the game is secondary (both students and band). It is certainly a California cultural thing that hurts the game experience and the home team. I don’t see how that is going to markedly change.

I watched the ACU vs Idaho game. ACU came storming back in the last half and scored 3 touchdowns only to lose when not converting a fourth down in Idaho territory down 3. There recipe to get back on the game was up tempo offense and quite a bit of passing. Up tempo prevented substitution and seemed to tire Idahos defense and I think if there is a weak link in Idaho’s defense it is their secondary. This was an ACU team that almost lost to Northern Colorado although transitive properties in college football are oftentimes meaningless.

I am not fatalistic about this upcoming game primarily because the Aggie defense is stout. Hopefully they can get some bodies back especially Rex Conners. Offense will need to improve and winning the turnover battle critical. I thought Miles had a nice game and navigated the pocket better. Offensive line still needs to gel.

I think I’d take out Larison so as not to risk injury.

Ags are pretty deep at wide receiver. Running back would be more logical in development. We don’t have the luxury of observing training camp and practice so I have got to think the coaches have their reasons.

probably as good (which of course not as good as Larison) but I think there is an insufficient sample size for comparison.

maybe fisher sees some action later this game. Need to get him on space.

because Larison is a harder runner and unless the oline opens more holes you need someone like Larison. That’s my best guess.

totally agree.

Idaho escapes with 27-24 win. They were tiring at the end. Maybe a bit hot and humid for them.

Total domination - up and down the field between the 20s, and 15 measley points.

Edit …. a measley 18 points.

…..and another red zone failure. Gale looking good though.

well penalties and lack of o-line push. In any event something needs to change.

whatever happened to Lan on the wildcat. Gives him another blocker and complete vision of field. He has historically scored quite a few TDs and first downs with that. Why abandon it?

Red zone struggles continue. Penalties and just lack of execution down there.

Perez is just not big enough and strong enough to get many yards without good blocking.

What a run by Larison for a first down - completely on his own.

it’s a culture thing …. Too bad.

I think they should have just gone LAN in wildcat on 4th.