Exactly, and we already have an ex Kings point guard with a proven track record in Les

I for one do not agree with any moves Sac State is doing. To me it seems like it’s all marketing and no substance.

Mike Bibby was an excellent point guard for the Kings. That’s doesn’t necessarily mean he’ll be a great coach. If only we can get our hands on another ex Kings point guard with proven ability to be a head coach.

Also, just because someone disagrees with you doesn’t make them “upset”. I respectfully think showing Les the door would be a huge mistake. I mean do the “big schools” not have turnover? I’d argue that because of NIL that it’s the norm now. Disruption isn’t always a good thing.

Then go follow Sac State. In the 20 plus years I have been affiliated with the school Coach Les has brought character and stability to our program. UC Davis is not a Potemkin Village like Sac State.

I love Coach Les and we should not even bring up firing him. The guy brings stability, character, and grit to our program. We need to see the value in what we have. The guy has never brought reproach on the school or team.

Nice. I hope this is true.

Great look!!!!

Let’s not worry too much about Sac State. It looks like we will be FBS. I hope we are at least competitive.

Did they also try to get Juan Soto? Geez….

I like the athletic logos, I don’t like the “university” logos.

The classic logos are phenomenal in my opinion.

I hate the double font logo. I wish we could stop using it.

Would be like a Deion hire, no?

Exactly. Embarrassing.

Remember when USC bailed out because we were not FBS? That was embarrassing. A premier university should not be subjected to that. We have to play with the big boys. Our rankings, endowment, alumni say we should be playing with the big boys. Football should say the same.

I have no idea if this is good or bad. None of those school seem to be good schools. Am I wrong here?

To be clear my Stanford work buddy texted me this before I saw it on the web. So people are picking up on it.

So does this mean we will be FBS?

It’s so laughable the idea of dropping football. It brings so much joy to alumnae. It keeps us connected to the university in such a special way. We cannot expect to excel based on attrition.

If that is the message we get from the AD especially with all the nuanced messages regarding moving on up, we need a new AD. Simple as that. And if we want to play with the big boys and girls we need to be ready to show these people the door a lot quicker. That’s just how business is done. No handouts. None of us paid tuition or donate for lackadaisacal efforts.

We need to move to FBS.

It’s going to happen, I just don’t know when.

I hope we don’t just have a “concept of a plan”.

Do they have a "concept of a plan"?