Should we? Don't know.
Will we? Yes.

Going on no info, except the UW reps....but feeling good about Cleeland. Great coaching around him, and some time behind Pinnick.

I think 2026 is going to be a good one.

Complaining about "pot shots" is comical. The victim mentality doesn't work when you come out swinging at the FCS, lying, embellishing, and the sh*tshow concerts, publicity stunts, etc. He put a target on his school's back with his behavior. He made his own battle tougher.
North Dakota State had ZERO push back from their conference mates or the country for that matter. Nobody was making fun of them. Their program was respected, and that wasn't just because of the winning. Big difference between the way the two schools went about things.

Hopefully Sac is successful. Failing and folding the program would not be good for CFB in CA.

Ahhhh......the perfectly manicured Toomey Field grass (early in the season when it wasn't raining). I miss the smell!

Sac is going to make so much money on this....they should have a big beautiful stadium in no time. The economic impact from Sac State football will change the region forever. It will put the NBA franchise up the street to shame. The Kings might get pushed out.

Tomorrow's Cal home game is not a rescheduled game (as far as I know). It was already on the schedule.

Sounds lucrative, doesn't it?

Yes to both.

100% agree.

I think I question our commitment to winning at the FBS level once we get there. We coasted for 18 or so years after the D1 move before Building Edwards / Biggs and getting serious. I'd guess we could fall into that again. But who knows.

Not sure what I'd prefer......potentially being a top FCS program every year, or toiling around .500 and having some really fun winning years every decade in the FBS. I lived the toiling .500 experience as a Cal fan growing up. It had its charm.

Winning a lot in the FCS is currently very fun.

Some Alabama State pics....Definitely a resemblance to Aggie Stadium in many ways.
When the Press Box add is built, the view over the campus and water tower is going to be nice (like the 3rd ASU pic).

Frustrating finish. Good to see some Aggie fans in the stands on TV.

With game guarantees and major increases to game revenue, Wood put it simply: “Football is paying for football.” — BlueGoldAg

The game revenue is the head-scratcher.....

I really wanted to get over this afternoon to watch the Ags, but it didn't work out!

are still in the fundraising stage and are working on securing funds. We will send an updated timeline once the project funding has been secured” — Jdur

This is what I was saying.....we 'ain't building nothin' yet. They've only just asked us to pay for it.

Sac and Davis are doing the same thing.....Sac is just pretending super hard.

If Cal Poly pulled this crazy BS, we'd be just as interested.

:rofl:

When its a smart and beneficial decision for Davis football, we'll be in the MWC. No matter where Sac is.

You do realize that around 8/10 people think Sac made a bad decision/deal here right?
As a contrast, NDSU public sentiment is waaaaay more positive (comparing because the moves were made at nearly the same time).

Nothing to see here, I guess?

Same here: 1 FBS game a year.

I think it should not be Sac every year. That would be great for them, dumb for us (for reasons we've beaten on over other threads...hah)