I’m not a betting man, but I think you might have something here!

Are wagers taken on Sac State FB?

I’m not sure what the line is in Vegas but I heard at Folsom State Pen people are putting 3 soups on the Hornets.

Yes, there are many outlets. I bet on UC Davis last year and did very well.

Wow. That is wild, especially considering how they have been talking recently. Even more wild considering schools like Missouri state, kennesaw state, Sam Houston all going fbs recently.

Those teams didn’t need a waiver, because they had a conference invite.

very true. Sac fans will not be happy anyways

Might be good for Sac to make a national impression in the playoffs. Assuming they don’t have too many scholarships for the Big Sky.

Good for the committee to impose some basic minimal standards here. Of course it's a horrible idea for Sac to go FBS independent with no money, no history of success, inadequate facilities, no apparent prospects for conference affiliation, and no similar peers in the west to help with scheduling.

The committee needs to have stricter requirements. I said elsewhere that Liberty, like them or not actually had a case. Sac State is not subject to collusion, they just arent desirable.

This is actually very funny after all of the big talk from Dr Woods and co.

How does this work with the Big Sky's 63 equivalency limit for the 2025 season? I had assume that Sac had been moving forward a larger number.

Any Luke Wood comment on this yet? Can't see recent posts without being logged in

my thoughts exactly. This is a major clusterf*ck in a lot of ways

Going to be interesting to see how many of their new recruits are still on board with normal FCS Big Sky football

Nope, no comment form him yet. At least on twitter that is.

deleted

deleted

More from Sam Herder.

https://share.google/hUHSCe0kZf0k2vb79

You can divide the NIL guess by 10 and would still be high on the amount they have to “invest.” The amount they have promised is something different.

Not the news I was expecting. I would have thought Wood and Co had made their calls and catered their steak dinners with the relevant decision makers before putting it all on the line. Though I suppose there are still plenty of politics to play out the rest of June. Assuming things stay as is, the Hornets have the potential to still be very good FCS contenders. But if a sense of bait and switch takes root in the locker room this could get messy. Who knows what’s actually been said to these guys. If conditions on the ground deteriorate, I could see Marion finding a way to deuce out. The way he’s scrapping on the career ladder, no way would he want to preside over a stuck-in-FCS team if the stock starts slipping.

deleted

So we were told by the Wood brothers that it's FBS or bust. If the decision aligns with the recommendation when are they folding their football program?

I haven’t found much “real”coverage of this but based on what I’m reading from online taking heads- next week there will be meetings to establish a new governance model followed by D1 council meetings. They can choose to take or leave the advice of the football committee that just said no thanks. The outside hope on J St is that the committee didn’t want to make any commitments right before a big governance reboot and the council may still say yes, or that a new governance model will include some new flexibility that doesn’t exist this week. So an unqualified answer might be next week they could get a more definitive yes/no, unless a new framework for a “maybe” presents itself. I guess “soon” is relative. If they get a hard no this year do they push another attempt next year or in 5 years, idk.

Sac has 39 transfers on the roster, and they are a mixed bag. About 18 are seniors or redshirt seniors; those guys all knew they would be playing an FCS schedule, whether the school was transitioning or not. The decision doesn’t really affect them. Many of the transfers committed before Sac announced they intended to transition this year. Maybe some of the younger ones will bail.

Sac might have a great year, if so they may get a conference invite, in which case getting turned down in their attempt to go independent could be in their interest,

Division 1 could split, separating off the power 4 conferences, and leaving the lesser conferences as essentially in the same situation FCS faces, being perceived as minor league. Sac may be trying to crash a party that has moved on.