There's a lot that's wrong with MLB today. Although I do like the 3 batter minimum rule for pitching changes I don't care for other rule changes, like the automatic runner on second in extra innings. That one's garbage. If they want to speed things up just end the game after 9 innings if it's not the playoffs. Ties are ok for soccer (hockey too I think) and little league, why not MLB ? If the game ends that way at least your team didn't lose. Tiebreakers can be used to determine the 1st place team if it comes down to ties figuring in the standings. A tie is a natural possible outcome of the game already: there's no meddling.
They should already be eliminating extra innings in college baseball to maximize the student-athletes' rest and study time. First and foremost their priority should be their studies; the competitions are just supposed to be a form of academic enrichment. After all, do fans really care about the outcome of a single college game in a week's time ? Not unless they're superfans or they're posting on a message board devoted to said sports team and happen to start a topic on it. Imagine how fewer the losses would be for UCD if there were no 10th inning. Like 3 at least per year.
Some Aggie trivia:
Vaughn has 1 tie in his coaching record. This is from a Sunday game in the 2015 opening series at Texas State. A tie was forced because the Aggies had to leave to catch their flight home. In a way, the Aggies swept that series because they captured all the wins that were awarded.
Beware, MLB has some partnerships with independent minor league baseball to test rule changes, and one thing they're testing in the Pioneer league (teams like the Boise Hawks, Billings Mustangs, etc) is the biggest bastardization of the game yet- a knockout round instead of extra innings ! After the completion of nine innings each team selects 1 player to participate in a homerun derby. Each player gets I think 10 swings, and whichever one has the most his team wins. This is an ok solution for independent leagues because they have a more limited player pool (no other teams to pull players from like in MLB) and often the games put a real strain on pitchers because quite frankly these teams are typically not as good as even your average double-A team. They're higher-scoring affairs with weaker pitching and defense. If that comes to MLB....
And these attempts to endear the players to fans orchestrated by MLB are just obnoxious. Player nickname day celebration is so stupid. Players wear jerseys with their nickname on them. Play the game-I don't give a whooping funt what they call them in the clubhouse. Most of ballplayer nicknames are stupid anyhow. They just add -y or -er to a player's first or last name. Other times they're inside jokes. Keep your jokes, folks. I pay to see the game not hear about behind the scenes crap.
Even the smart guys for UCD can't spot a good nickname opportunity when they see it. Take former infielder Mason Novak for instance. The Office was not so far removed from its last episode when he played but I heard not one player call him "Ryan" or "Ryan the Temp". Now that would have been a smart nickname. For background on that, one of the show's writers and principal actors was B.J. Novak. What a waste of an opportunity.
I swear this to be true, but at one of the Cal Poly games there was a Mustang batter named Nick and his teammate was encouraging him with "go Nick-er!" Do not do that, lest ye be cancelled by leftist trolls, sir. Makes me wonder how the Cal Poly announcer handled Mitch Haniger at bats. Probably a longer pause between syllables. "Now batting...Mitch. Ha.....ni...............ger."
One of the reasons for the lower batting averages is the meddling of analytics nerds in the game. They compile reports and filter down information to coaches about how a player needs to alter their stance and swing in order to hit for more power, and the focus of most players is to swing for the fences every time because some nerd is whispering in their coaches' ears + they'll get benched if they don't listen. The all-or-nothing approach results in a lot more strikeouts. You know something's wrong when Austin Slater has seven homeruns before the All-Star break, when really before 2020 it was more likely to take him 3 years to hit that many.
Off course the pitchers' cheating has something to do with it. Kevin Gausman and Anthony Desclafani were mediocre at best before coming to SF and now they're putting up jaw-dropping numbers. No, I'm not buying the idea that a change of scenery alone made that possible.
Also, they deadened the baseball a bit this year to cut down on the homeruns but the players haven't adjusted their approach. Still playing homerun derby and making more outs when they don't quite get everything out of a pitch and swing.
Really MLB has deteriorated into each teams' back office nerds essentially engaging in robot battles.