Hawaii is in the WBIT, which is now the #2 postseason women’s tournament. They are an aq for winning the regular season title, but losing in the tournament.

St. Mary’s was seeded 6th in the WCC tournament, and was beaten in the 3rd round by #7 Pacific by 15. Pacific lost in the quarterfinals to #3 Washington State by 11.

Neither Irvine nor Davis was selected to the WNIT, which is now the #3 post season tournament. Despite having better records that 22 of the 48 teams selected. Four teams selected had losing records. No teams from the BW or MW made the tournament.

Movie lover & DrMike - I stand corrected. I relied on my memory and a quick perusal of the bio on the UCD MBB website. Did not due diligence as I should. Mea culpa! : > (

Three last thoughts (for me) on this thread.

I heard John Madden once say that if a coach is doing a good job, it was stupid to get rid of him unless you absolutely KNEW you had someone better signed and ready to step in and replace him. Not sure that's very realistic in the present coaching climate, in just about any sport.

Kind of related to that, Jim Les WANTS to be at UCD. He voluntarily left his alma mater, Bradley, to return to the Sacramento area and take the UCD job, because he and his wife wanted to return to this area. This isn't a stepping stone for Jim Les, the way it would be for many good, even very good, coaches who might replace him. Having someone who wants to stay at a UCD type school in a Big West or Mountain West conference is worth a great deal. IMHO

Jen Gross seems to have a great deal of respect for Les. That says a great deal as well.

A 21-win season is good in anyone’s book. In more prestigious conferences, that many wins gets you into the tournament. Several teams with worse records will receive at large bids this year.

Jen Gross and her staff do a great job. This was a great group to work with, fun to watch and they never quit. But the fact is that this team had one dependable double-digit scoring threat - Tova Sabel. Nya and Megan improved in all offensive categories this year, but neither were consistent scorers. Megan hit double-digits in 14 games; Nya did it 9 times. Tova a hit double-digits 28 times.

That allowed teams to focus too easily on Sabel, and that made us too vulnerable, especially against better / better-coached teams. It’s like Tova was our Steph Curry, but we didn’t have a Klay to go with, that someone else that had to be equally accounted for. Second option by committee just isn’t as effective.

Agree with you on that. Physicality seems to be a chronic issues for the Aggies. Our women are just too nice; need some players who have an edge or who grew up with several older brothers. The last team that didn't seem to bother was when Nagel-Gianotti-Nafekh played. They weren't overly physical, but it didn't seem to throw them off.

As for turnovers, those have been a problem. However, since Gross has been head coach, the Aggies have been between 13-20 per game each year - career average is 15+. The backdoor cut is key to the Princeton offense as she runs it, and it isn't an easy play to execute. It's beautiful when you do it, but it is turnover prone...and that doesn't include the missed layups. Those TO's we have to live with. It's the "got-rattled" and the open-court bad pass turnovers they have to avoid.

I think Laura Baugh is now probably the point person on coaching the bigs. Based on her University of Tennessee and WNBA stints.

And looking at the data in the Cal Matters article, we've been outspent on the NIL front by UCSB, UCSD, UCI and Sac State, Since none of the three UC's have football programs, MBB is probably their flagship sport, and get the lion's share of NIL. The NIL spending disparity for our MBB program is probably much worse than just the gross amounts indicate.

Finally to CA Forever's point, "It shouldn't be any harder to recruit to Davis than the other UCs", Santa Barbara,San Diego (La Jolla), and to a little lesser degree, Irvine are all more of the California Image / Vibe than Davis is. We got no sandy beach to walk along. That in itself is probably a big selling point, especially for out-of-state and foreign players.

Most of the comments have been about Jim Les' ability to recruit, develop players, and do the X'x and O's. But being head coach is also about managing the program resources. And with the changes in athletics that we talk about, it's becoming even more about that,

Does anyone have a sense of how Jim is win that regard?

UCD has 3 assistant coaches for MBB. LBSU, Bakersfield, and Fullerton also have 3 assistants. All the other BW schools have at least 4 assistants. That's 1 (or 2) more people to work on recruiting, game planning, player development, etc.

Jen Gross has 5 assistant coaches this year.

What's the budget for either MBB or WBB? Who has the final say on how it's allocated? More bodies make a difference, especially over time. I wonder how long the other BW schools have had larger coaching staffs?

Perhaps expanding the coaching staff will be part of the increased expenditures on basketball that were part of the agreement to move to the Mountain West?

A tale of 2 halves...Hawaii ALMOST pulled it out.

Game site: Henderson NV
Website: https://bigwest.org/sports/2024/9/21/2025-big-west-basketball-championships.aspx

This marks the 11th consecutive season (non-COVID) that the Aggies WBB team has reached the BW Tournament QF or higher.

Led by Ryann Bennett and Tova Sabel, the Aggies rally in the 2nd half, take down UCSD on the road. The win secures a first round bye in the Big West Tournament.

Aggies drop one to Irvine 55-53. The fourth conference loss by 3 points or less.

There's a great highlight video on the WBB Instagram page. Check it out.

The Age came back from 10 points down. Twice!! Win by 8, making free throws down the stretch.

Aggies drop another close one, 65-63. Cold from 3 in the 4th quarter. It was a chippy game...UCSD quite physical in a nasty sort of way. We thought we got the short end of the stick as far as officiating. What was okay for the Tritons to do - which forced many of the turnovers - resulted in fouls for the Aggies.

Maybe getting consistently large, and hopefully, enthusiastic student crowds would start to make University Credit Union Center an attraction. If the game is exciting, I've noticed the crowds get into it, so that's where the "hopefully enthusiastic" comes from.

As an aside, I'd love to go back to "Pavilion" instead of "Center". University Credit Union Pavilion sounds just fine, and there's no way that "the UCUC" will ever become as catchy as "the Pav" was. IMHO.

My suggestion would be to PUSH the Flexbooks, which is what we purchase. With a FLOCK of grandkids between 3rd grade and high school, involved in youth sports and performing arts - sometimes multiple activities at a time - we can't plan to be at specific games too far in advance. The Flexbooks allow us to plan around those higher priority events. Or we can easily bring friends or neighbors if that opportunity presents itself. They're a really good deal.

I agree that the way to a college student's heart is through his/her stomach. LOL At least it was in my day - don't ask when that was!
But rather than TAKE pizzas to frats and residence halls, try FEEDING students at the game or for attending the game. If you take them the pizzas, they've got the goodies without doing anything.
Instead, if the first 300 (or whatever number) students through the door get a $10 gift card for one of the lunch deals at Woodstocks, Pizza Guys, etc., I think that would bring students in the door. Let students with meal plans use that at the games and give them a discount for getting a meal at the game.
As long as the promo is used at both MBB and WBB games, I'd donate to a collection to fund something like that.

I'm not sure UCSD & UCI are apt comparisons. Neither of those campuses ever had a football program, so there's been a focus on men's basketball as the flagship sport since the beginning. That's a huge difference! Football can be a revenue generating or even a profitable sport that helps fund the entire program. But it's also a sport that demands a huge allocation of resources up front (money, media, energy, etc.), regardless of whether it's successful. Those campuses have always been able to focus those resources on basketball, particularly men's basketball.

it's also not clear that the students at UCSD or UCI are "engaged in hoops", per se, despite both schools having solid programs. There's a significant difference in the attendance at UCD MBB games and the attendance at MBB games at those campuses, but not so much on the women's side. And there's no breakdowns anywhere of what percentage of any school's attendance is students.

I do agree that there will need to be some changes in the structure within athletic departments going forward. The GM model seems to be the way that most schools are going, at least for now. How schools manage that will be interesting to follow. And doesn't the agreement with the MW stipulates that investment in the men's and women's basketball programs be at an increased level by the time we are members? That would seem to indicate that there's a plan in place to do that. I know that on the women's side, UCD has gone from a 4 person coaching staff to a 6 person staff just this season.