Causeway tickets look like they are already going fast on the Ags website compared to the game against ISU.

Don't we possibly have to win 'x' number of playoff games to increase the chance of the Connor brothers getting a medical redshirt year?

That worries me that Sac fans may be buying up the tickets fast...

I don’t know, the Enterprise makes it sound like they need to be at 4 games or less (unless the appeal is won) regardless of the number of playoff games in which we participate.

Are you suggesting we want a non-seed to have a chance at playing 5 playoff games instead of a seed which limits us to 4? Teams that aren’t seeded rarely get even 3 games in the postseason. If we get a top 4 seed, which probably only happens if Montana loses either to Sac or MSU, the first 2 playoff games would be at UCDHS making 3 total additional contests not that unrealistic to expect.

According to the rule Medical respdshirts have to play in a maximum of 30% or less of contests rounded up to an integer.
Lets assume they have two playoff games
12 regular season games counting mercer:
14 *.30 = 4.2 rounding up = 5 games.

Where do you see it’s rounded up an integer?

I think its too early to talk playoffs. Need 7 wins and we saw how explosive Northern Colorado is. If you want to talk playoffs after this game, that gets them to 6 needing at least 1 more but reasonable. A loss this week makes it much tougher.

AI from a google search
The NCAA rounds up any fractional portion of a contest when calculating the 30% rule for a medical redshirt. For example, if an athlete competed in 30% of a 31-game season, that would be 9.3 games, which rounds up to 10 games. Therefore, the athlete would not be eligible for a medical redshirt if they participated in more than 10 games.

The relevant NCAA form form 4 uses this same example but its in PDF and word documents i cant download on my old IPAD.