you can fit more butts per square foot on bleachers than grass. I think they assume each grass end zone holds about 1000. Each bleacher section has an average of 400-450 seats. You could fit maybe 5 sections each end? So net gain of a couple thousand? Given how popular the grass berms are and that they wouldn’t be great seats, I don’t know if the juice is worth the squeeze. Unless maybe there was a desire to move the students to an end zone. The north end zone at the Toom I think had a bigger impact on the game than students at the 50. I wonder if there is a market for on-field cabanas. I have seen some schools starting to bring premium seating onto the field to fill in dead space around end zones to bring the crowd noise closer.

Agreed on all points, just trying to maximize seats while minimizing cost. I don’t have a problem moving the students to the end zone especially with my time at Toomey but I imagine there would be some uproar about what was communicated/promised back ahead of construction.

I like the grass. I think it adds character. Without it our stadium wouldn’t feel unique at all.

I did a little googling to find what the top NILs were. These are estimates, but a see similar numbers from various articles. Top schools like Texas paid out something like $20M, do the Sac12 would be able to jump to big boy table!

Of course, no one knows what NIL collectives will look like when the revenue sharing kicks in. Power 5 conferences can pay up to $22M - presumably most of that domes from donors redirecting their NIL ‘pledges’. Group of 5 limit is much lower.

Scroll to the 3 minute mark to hear their opinion about the push for Sac to be in the PAC12:

The Pac-? needs some of those schools to join for a different reason, as they all sponsor baseball. Colorado St, Boise St, and Utah St do not, which leaves them with 4 teams otherwise. Of lesser importance I'm sure. Boise had a team for a minute in 2020.

I’ll be mad is sac goes and we don’t….

There is no reason they have an advantage over us. If they make this happen it’s because they took a chance that we weren’t willing to take. I don’t think financially they are in a better spot than us. Same region. Currently worse facilities…

they didn’t really say anything, did they? Other than sac wants to move up obviously….else no meat

Yes, it seems most of the talk is about momentum and keeping the push alive.

go to the Sac State board and they think they will get 4 or 5 star players to decommit from Alabama or Texas to play for them lol. They also think that they will be second in recruiting of all FBS teams except USC lol. Cal, UCLA, and Stanford are way ahead of Sac.

no doubt they will struggle for a bit. However, a move up is better than not…

Any time you can add a team to your FBS conference that has made four playoff appearances in 31 FCS seasons - with three of those being with one coach who is no longer there and the fourth being the year after he left - you just have to do it.

Looking more like the....

Sac
3-12

right now :D

Who would have expected them to be 3-7 at this point :D

I almost feel bad that it will affect their recruiting.

Don't feel too bad. They will always be able to recruit players who are barely eligible anyway.