• Russ Bowlus
    345
    Looks like Davis's old NCAC and CCAA conference-mate is cutting their entire athletic program, in addition to numerous academic degree programs, to try to close a $24-million budget deficit.

    https://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news/sonoma-state-ssu-rohnert-park-cuts/
  • SochorField
    241
    This is sad. Liberal Arts programs and DII athletics bear the brunt.
    I am glad they are keeping the music program. The Green Music Center is beautiful.
  • Jackbacker2
    33
    This is very sad for Sonoma state. The CSUS are really hurting. I was surprised and glad when Humboldt State changed to a more protected status of a Poly tech.

    I can see other CSUS cutting their entire ICA department. Sac state and their bid to go to the Pac-?,. may result in the loss of their entire ICA department. I also could see Sac state losing their entire department if they stayed in the Big Sky.

    The future of all of NCAA sports department is very unsettled. I have no idea where anything will be in the next 2 to 5 years.
  • SochorField
    241
    You bring up some interesting points. College sports at California universities seem to have been retracting, not growing, since the '90's (especially football). I was originally going to say "this sounds like a short term issue that could fix itself" but now I'm not so sure anymore.
    I think any specific program/team that isn't bringing in some cash is on the block these days.
  • Jackbacker2
    33
    I agree Sochor field, but which most CSUS departments do NOT bring anything more than a pittance. Which means most are in danger of being cut. I feel for those that may lose their teams and for those that will NOT have a chance to compete at a CSUS school.
  • movielover
    570
    Given the lower attendance of male students - sometimes 35% or less of college enrollment - having a football team may help reduce that imbalance.
  • fugawe09
    231
    This is unfortunate but the current model of higher education is moving toward one where the residential on-campus experience is a luxury and due to inability or unwillingness to control student housing costs, more and more students are online, satellite campus, or hybrid. This isn’t all bad, because it opens college up to people doing career reboots or caring for children. But I think it is eroding the personal connection people have to their university and willingness for alumni and communities to remain engaged. Except at the P4 level I think it is difficult to find appreciable direct revenue. So the question becomes is the strategic value worth it? For many CSU campuses the answer may be no. Sonoma State isn’t trying to be a household name on the east coast and I think increasingly people are just seeking a teaching credential, CPA license, etc. through the most economical means they can, which for many might mean limited time on campus. And I think for that type of student, once the degree is awarded, the transaction is complete and they don’t really desire alumni engagement, athletics or otherwise.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to Aggie Sports Talk!

AggieSportsTalk.com, the pulse of Aggie athletics. The home of Aggie Pride. Create an account to contribute to the conversation!