Sorry I was referring to Tompkins. Still sad about Thomas, what a great player with a terrible break

Considering the Cal Poly offense is not taking any time (not that they need to) we could see some offensive records broken today. Still not sure if it will be a W though

Hastings in at QB and throws a pick six

Put TT in and run it the rest of the game I guess, I don't think Cal Poly is beating the Ags, but UCD can beat the Ags

I don't know who's most to blame for that but it doesn't matter, can't happen

Same, all other things being equal.

No plan from SDSU. Refused to adapt when they saw that the shooters weren't having a good night. Now there's no choice but to chuck threes, and it doesn't even matter if the percentage improves to something not horrible, it's too late for that

Syracuse is now pummeling SDSU in the 11-6 matchup and while that is great for the chaos lovers I am for one not having a good time

I like how Idaho dropped out despite being 1-1 against now-ranked opponents, with a win over #15.

Well you ended up being dead on, thanks for crunching the numbers!

BWC twitter says this is the best WBB seed since 2004. I'm also vengefully happy that we placed higher than the MWC champion (Wyoming) -- I've had a gut feeling for a while that the MWC is undersupporting WBB, though that's heavily biased due to how poor SDSU's WBB team does compared to its other spectator sports.

Urgh, not great for seeding. Technically speaking Ags reliant on conference tourney upsets and just plain bad conferences with autobids to avoid a 16 seed. Or the committee factoring in momentum and unique circumstances. The Hawaii loss hurt, Ags were into the 50-60 range before that.

UCSB Men, by comparison, made it to the 12 line with a staggering 54 in NET, which feels like about the highest I've ever seen a BWC team finish in NET/RPI.

Might be months before we know and dependent on how the tournament run goes. Also wondering if there's some other factors like if Trpcic leaves and Hall thinks she might get more time running the point for WNBA prep purposes, etc.

UCD was a 15 seed in 2019 but really same difference. Very easy to argue that was an underseeding for a team that finished on a 21-1 streak in D1 play with some brutal margins of victory

Looking at Irvine's forum -- they have pretty active WBB game threads -- it looks like their big takeaway from the game is that UCI couldn't match up with Stobbart and that created defensive problems everywhere for the small ball lineup they run. They settled on the conclusion that UCI needs to recruit simply better players to compete with Gross's lineups.

I'm wondering if the conference needs to have a serious look at how much they're supporting/willing to support their WBB programs with things like budgets for assistants/recruiting/facilities. Not sure Davis is vastly outspending everyone else right now, but there have been some nice Pavilion upgrades, the athletics center is on the way, and we have an unrivaled staff in the conference. If the other BWC teams are just funding WBB to the minimum for Title IX balancing purposes (no real evidence that this is the case, but the results indicate it might be) then they will have a very tough time catching up to UCD's momentum.

Great writeup. It's hard to actually keep track of all the different years now, especially considering we've had complete roster turnover since the first Splash Sisters championship.

One thought and possible correction though: since there's a blanket extra year of eligibility, I wonder if that means we will still consider Stobbart and Konrad as juniors (and Turner as a sophomore) in Fall -- something I'm sure the rest of the conference is thrilled about. Not sure how many people will actually take the extra year of eligibility when they've met graduation requirements down the line though.

That fourth quarter. Utter destruction

UCI getting a sense of urgency to harass the forwards and now they're leaving Turner open, which I think the last few teams made a point to avoid

47-36, Irvine calls timeout!!

GREAT move by Konrad to put the lead in double digits and make this game feel like it's been blown open

TIED 26-26 at the half, great 1 second play to Hall to close out

Up by one after the first quarter. UCI is good on defense and stifled the Aggie offense these past few minutes

Won the ToP battle and had both more passing yards and more rushing yards. I guess "turnovers are the difference" might be the takeway but even that isn't really much of an explanation because I think they only got 3 points of TOs and one of them was essentially a punt equivalent

Did Rodrigues even attempt 300 yards "worth" of passes before the final desperation drive? Didn't seem like it, but that might be selective memory.

Seems like despite being a spread offense on paper, the coaches really want to run a more conservative ground game, but at tempo with trick plays thrown in. It can devastate ok/so-so defenses but Weber was just too good for that.

Aggie defense has taken a step forward this year but not as far of a step as we initially thought. Can't help but think that some previous UCD teams would have been smoked by this offense.

Playcalling seems about the same to me, maybe a little better, but with more healthy talent on the roster than last year. Doesn't make it anything to write home about, just less of a liability but still something that showed today.

Clock and timeout errors are inexusable when you're playing from behind against a better team, and not even in a particularly hostile environment. It sounds unreasonable but I literally expect perfection in this kind of area from UCD squads. We're not going to outrun and out-muscle the top teams in the FCS, but we can decide that we're going to execute better than them.