Well they added a (very expensive) game for 2026 but seemingly lost another in the process https://fbschedules.com/sacramento-state-adds-youngstown-state-to-2026-football-schedule/#google_vignette

Hopefully not benchmarking against Sac

Did he really say that? When?

Watching him run the first time, I couldn’t help but think, ok get him off. Don’t push it here, he’s going to get hurt or fumble.

17k???

There are a lot of things working against them to get a full schedule together for 2026 and beyond. It will be interesting to watch at least.

Surprisingly I haven't seen a big follow up in the Chronicle on how Sac did with their $4 million FBS team vs a JV FCS team. I wonder if they had a game.

Is the stream clearing up yet? I had to turn it off

Wood has big dreams, has raised tens of millions of dollars, will build a beautiful new stadium on campus ... er at Cal Expo, and there is no way this will all fail spectacularly. https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/college/article/sacramento-state-football-sports-20824108.php?utm_source=marketing&utm_medium=copy-url-link&utm_campaign=article-share&hash=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc2ZjaHJvbmljbGUuY29tL3Nwb3J0cy9jb2xsZWdlL2FydGljbGUvc2FjcmFtZW50by1zdGF0ZS1mb290YmFsbC1zcG9ydHMtMjA4MjQxMDgucGhw&time=MTc1NjU5NTU4OTgxOA%3D%3D&rid=MTkyODBlNDgtMmJhYi00ODdjLTkyZWEtZjM2ZDc5NTFjNzIw&sharecount=MA%3D%3D

Pretty ridiculous (and long) puff piece in the Chronicle today

What are the rules for declaring a winner v no contest? I assumed it was like baseball and obviously in 4th quarter we collect the W, deserved or no

Given how this stadium charade is going, along with the FBS plan, one has to wonder if the bottom may fall out on their 2026 schedule. They don't have money to pay for six homes games. Big Sky games will be hard to come by. Are they going to sign a bunch of oddball FCS home and homes to fill out the schedule?

It's probably moot as Sac would not agree to it even if we wanted it. So probably won't happen and that'll be the end of the series until we move up I guess.

If Sac will agree to continuing the home and home series, we should do that, just like we did when we were D2 and they were I-AA. If they only want home games, they need to pay like Cal or Stanford or other FBS options, which they won't be able to. So that'll be the end of that until we move up.

Just another demonstration that this has all been vaporware, fake it til you make it. He probably smells some state funding if he can locate at Cal Expo. It's worth floating this, exposing everything to date as a sham and a waste, because he doesn't have any actual money for a stadium on campus, at Hornet Stadium. So, small chance this can pan out is worth a lot more than the dead end plan he had previously. :roll:

Disappointing if the Causeway goes for at least 2026 but this is what they signed up for going independent. They're going to be struggling to get home games and this will make it even harder.

Sacramento State, which has had some of the most downtrodden athletic facilities in the country, is upgrading its football home, Hornet Stadium, to a 25,000-seat multiuse venueexpected to be completed by the fall of 2027. It’s estimated to cost as much as $300 million, which Wood confirms will be funded by money allocated to the athletic department, as well as sponsorships and donor pledges.

How do people write this stuff and not ask any follow up questions? At least here it's 2027 instead of the 2026 Wood claims elsewhere. When is construction starting? What will it actually cost? Where is the final design? Specifically, in exact dollars, how is it actually being funded? It's all vaporware that media just take at face value.

Interesting read. I think that's the first time we've seen a realistic estimate for stadium cost ($300 million). Still no details about how to plausibly pay for it, beyond hand waving and promises of future fundraising.

Agreed settling and letting Sac in may be the most likely to avoid the litigation. "All right, fine, if you want to fail so bad, so hard, be our guest"

Not an expert on the legal landscape here but it seems like an uphill battle when you're arguing you have a legal right to a waiver in a process like this