Aggie Sports Talk

  • Aggie Sports Talk
  • Blog
  • Members

  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State




    Great Preview fellas, Flush is a great guy
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    ↪Pacifico2


    Won't make much difference here pretty soon - when we're in the same conference.
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    ↪BaseballAtDobbins


    Need to get back to scheduling a Nevada, SJSU maybe Cal every year. While I love the road trip to Dallas next season, UCLA the season after, it's a better trip for the local fanbase to just go play Nevada.
  • Big Sky Football Games Week 12
  • Big Sky Football Games Week 12
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    ↪Jdur


    Let's goooo!
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    I almost feel like with Pinnick's elite ability to extend the play, Plough gets greedy on pass pro, and just sends another receive out off of chip blocks. I don't think we get away with that this week. Want Pinnick protected, period, let the receivers work.
  • Big Sky Football Games Week 12
  • 2025 FCS Playoff Prognostication
    I think there's a bias, and I think that's only natural given the FCS Landscape:

    fcs-college-football-map-1.png

    Also, I'm making the note, but there isn't a single FCS team in the States of Wyoming, New Mexico, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Michigan or Wisconsin?
  • Big Sky Football Games Week 12
    ↪Kadeezy


    Seems the only logical explanation why the call wasn't overturned.

    If that play happened in Davis for Davis, I'd call that proper camera management at home.
  • 2025 FCS Playoff Prognostication
    ↪movielover


    Yeah, maybe, but we also had a RFr. QB in his first collegiate start ever.
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    Keys to this game are going to be Emotion and QB play...which in turn stems from OL/DL play.
  • Big Sky Football Games Week 12
    ↪MTBAggie


    You know, bang-bang plays, people make mistakes - however, when you dissect it under scrutiny in slow motion, I mean come on, makes you look incompetent or otherwise compromised... Sac must've given them the worst view of that play known to football. No normal human being doesn't overturn that call on the field. You know what, credit the receiver for finishing the play - you never know what can happen.
  • Big Sky Football Games Week 12
    ↪MTBAggie


    Damage is already done.
  • 2025 FCS Playoff Prognostication
    ↪SochorField


    What is sexy is how well Davis played in that game and how good Mercer is currently looking - while it doesn't count, it's still a solid showing on national tv.
  • UC Davis @ Montana State
    ↪Pacifico2


    I am in complete agreement with these observations.
  • 2025 FCS Playoff Prognostication
    ↪SoCalAggie


    We are always battling Midwest and East Coast bias...and maybe Montana bias as well -- Aggies are the biggest wrench to the Montana machine in the Big Sky right now, and we have plans to move to FBS while these schools look to continue dominating the FCS, I imagine that isn't looked at favorably by the Committee. The two picks in the 2nd half performance were not worthy of a Top 12 team, Pinnick has to be sharper and more consistency is needed. Honestly, I think the Committee pushed Davis down because they see them beating Sac, and it gives a chance for other mid-tier teams to get better positioned going into the final week.

    Plough will have the guys firing on all cylinders this Saturday - question is if this team, which has shown some discipline issues at times, will keep their composure when Marion and his Hornets start jawing at them.
  • 72nd Causeway Classic: UC Davis vs. Sac State
    ↪fugawe09


    ...a lot of interest.
  • 2025 FCS Playoff Prognostication
    So lame, not getting the Mercer result...like Plough said, if it doesn't count towards our Playoff push, no stats recorded, why should it count towards a player's eligibility? The only reason I can think of is that the 4 game exposure cutoff is directly related to in-game experience, and while the game didn't count it was 3.5 quarters of game time regardless - just seems cheap if there's no meaningful result.
Home » AggieFinn
More Comments

AggieFinn

Start FollowingSend a Message
  • About
  • Comments
  • Discussions
  • Uploads
  • Terms of Service
  • Useful Hints and Tips
  • Sign In
  • Created with PlushForums
  • © 2025 Aggie Sports Talk