the official word out as of a few days ago was “nothing new to share at this time.” Not sure if no news is good or bad really.

$850k pain and suffering plus medical. If she has permanent scarring on her face then this might be a reasonable claim, although the claims of umbrella anxiety and PTSD seem extreme. They'll settle confidentially. I'm surprised she is just suing the Oregon coach. Wouldn't be surprised to see UCD get sued as well for allowing an unsafe condition on its property.

Certainly this will be premium pricing based on proximity to campus and the attached lifestyle restaurants and shopping. They can influence this toward or away from students based on lease terms if they want. There is a market of people who will pay- West Village has a waiting list. Curious if the retail and dining will struggle to fill in like West village. I do see a parking problem here - almost 900 beds but less than 300 parking spaces for residential. The real question is whether this and other projects add enough rental stock to bring prices down out of orbit at existing properties around town through supply and demand.

I mean I suppose we could bring back Gould, CGS, and Terry Tumey for diversity sake.

I remember they used to occasionally push the tables together into a runway and have an all-male revue. Had a roommate who kept “accidentally” going for a burger on those nights.

Last I knew, banned from all away games, limited to 50 members at home games and 30 members at BW tournament because the other schools were all complaining.

I'm referring to the first person quoted in the Aggie story who gave their name and kicked this off. They are a leader at a campus community advocacy center. My goal is not to dox the individual, but just provide some context. I frequently research people quoted in the news to learn about their angle. No idea who the second two people are in that story, in fact there is no "she" mentioned, everyone is identified as "they".

Both of these articles highlight some individual incidents that are worthy of investigation but are isolated.

The supporting evidence is mostly half-truths or non-truths twisted to fit the needs of a sensationalized story. Example, I was in the alleged "naked van" from the Chronicle article and it was a non-event. Two guys took their shirts off between Redding and Shasta because the van AC was on the fritz. End of story.

Bottom line -
1. Drinking to excess is a personal choice, and not always a smart one.
2. If people want to sing dirty songs or make phallus candles on their own time in their own house, well isn't that their right? Maybe don't go over to their house if that's not your thing? It would seem to be dangerous territory to try to regulate speech in private homes.
3. So what if women want to wear booty shorts and a sports bra to band practice? People acceptably wear this to the ARC or while jogging all the time.

My understanding is that the original complaints reported to the University were handled in accordance with policy, the individuals declined to make it a police matter, and the organization made constitutional changes to be able to better remove problem individuals. As the ink was drying, the Aggie published a smear job, the chief witness being paid student activist with a stated career goal of becoming a professional social justice activist. Consider the source. Then the Bee comes in an uses the Chronicle and Aggie articles as their journalistic support. Move along, nothing to see here...

Meh, I’m a block CA person. Comet is ok, but I was never into baseball. The 2 font word mark is maybe starting to feel dated, the Davis being too bold comparatively. But it’s taken 20+ years to standardize campus signage. With the infrequency of refurbs it would take another 20 to change it!

The NCAA needs to get over themselves and their false rhetoric of purity, wasting resources on a blip this small, meanwhile business as usual at the SEC and ACC. The rules are so obscure, convoluted, and result in such disparate consequences, you’d think they were written by the postmaster general.

There’s a second athletics style guide that lists C-Horse as a secondary mark. Looks like they are trying to keep athletics and academic branding separate. Not even the same shades of blue and gold. https://marketingtoolbox.ucdavis.edu/visual-identity/athletics-style-guide.html

And like that, the wheels just fell off the wagon. Too bad to see the AAF meltdown. It was a fun league. I still think there is an appetite for minor league professional football in some markets but as we’ve seen here, maybe not financially viable on its own without an NFL tie-in.

how are athletic scholarships funded? Is it taxpayers, donors, student fees, or other sources? I guess the question is whether the people footing the bill are aware and/or bothered by this.

Up until a few months ago the wife of the owner of the Grad was on city council, so I doubt they’re getting screwed over.

so what you’re saying is that Title IX is more likely to provide for a third gender curling team than an American tennis team. I’m curious what the money flow is in tennis. Got to be some incentive for offshoring the talent. With the NCAA, the buck always stops with, well, whoever has the most bucks.

Free parking is also available in Lot 56, located behind the facility's scoreboard. — agalum

Don't overlook this favor. TAPS typically "taps" until 10pm on Fridays, so thank whoever shoe'd away the parking vultures looking to exact their $50 of revenge.

I agree with you, 69, but I wouldn't want to use "foreign-born" too loosely. Certainly there are many individuals who were born abroad but have lived in the US a substantial portion of their life and consider the US "home." Very different from somebody who considers themselves another country "home," comes here for college and then intends to go back to said country, as would appear to be the case with many tennis players. You could justify some academic scholarships from the latter bucket with goals of diversity and academic cross-pollination. For athletic scholarships? Seems like a win at any cost move. Maybe you could make a case for a revenue producing team that there's return on investment (although I think there is too much of a profit drive in collegiate sports anyway). But for a non-revenue team, I can't see the upside for the taxpayers. It's not like a tennis conference championship has a lot of publicity value. In my opinion, state universities have a duty first and foremost to residents of said state so the proportion of scholarships to foreign exchange students shouldn't be higher in any one sport than it is in the university as a whole.

I don’t follow baseball one bit so I didn’t initially see the Reds similarity but I get your point and it’s a fair one.

whoa, easy there with the Band-uh!... there's tradition to uphold. :wink:

In all seriousness though, UC Davis did not have an official logo until 1999, when the C-Horse logo was introduced and the blue and gold were defined as specific hues. This was a committee project with students, staff, and a marketing company. It was consistent with the times. Photoshop and large format digital printers were becoming a thing so everyone wanted complex logos with shadows, gradients, etc.

For the 90 years or so before that, there were various iterations of CA logos, what I will call the "Block CA" with the A in the middle of the C, the "Interlocked CA" where the bottom of the C formed the cross of the A, the "Horse and Wheat CA" with a horse head and wheat stalk in the middle of the C and a small A in the open part of the C, and the "Lemon CA." The script "Davis" and "UCD" in block letters were also common. What did most of these have in common? They were easy for a non-artist to replicate by hand, whether stitching on a uniform or painting on a milk can.

Fast forward to today, logos once again need to be simple and speak for themselves without a caption, because they are seen most frequently on social media on 5" phone screens. I'm sure the powers that be realized the C-Horse was too complicated in tiny form and not widely recognized. There is also a trend among universities to brand their academics and athletics separately. So in the last few years (timing seemed to be about when Learfield got involved), athletics developed their own logo package with UC Davis in the "Invader" font (you could buy it for yourself if ya really want) as the primary mark and both the Lemon CA and C-Horse as secondary marks, although notice that athletics has modified the C-Horse to be a darker blue and less yellowy gold.

Here's several of the old logos seen together in an Enterprise photo


I'm partial to the Block CA, but I'm cool with the Lemon CA too. They have that timeless, needs no introduction look.

"contingent on EWU's background check"... Really? Why bother? Since they are OK with felony beat downs in fast food parking lots and all.