The Ags need to step up the intensity. They need to want it more. Right now they are not playing.

What’s with the refs. Have they been paid off? Montana plays dirty, but then again they always have.

GO AGGIES BEAT THE TEDDY BEARS

Inspired by the Wyoming fan in the stands in Fort Collins at the border war game with Colorado State who wore a shirt with “Beat sheep” on it. (CSU are the Rams). Sort of a linguistic emasculation of your opponent.

I actually agree pretty much with Davis Aggie. If anyone has the watchespn app, the ISU Liberty game is Very entertaining. ISU put up 650 yards of offense but lost by 7. I then watched SDSU vs No. Iowa. SDSU was without Wallace, their leading rusher and looked horribly flat as No. Iowa won. OK, I have no life.

love it. Like one of those big compound German words

Ha ha!

the coaches poll is a joke. Besides the Ags being ranked too low, North Dakota should be higher and Idaho State could beat most of the ranked schools. It seems much of the ranking is based on memory from last year. As long as the coaches don’t vote in the playoff seedings and this poll does not influence that - I don’t really care. As many have said - polls are too easy to get hung up on.

Does anyone know the criteria or process of forming the playoff selection committee?

I am envious! Have a great time. This is one place I’d like to see a game. Might have joined you except I am playing Brass this weekend at Reformation Services.

I truly believe that the Ags are the better team, and clearly so this year. The Ags have mote team speed and more weapons. Snead can be rattled so pressure and containment on him will be critical as well as ball security. The one thing I am a bit worried about is the erratic punting game - and of course it is a difficult environment.

ya.... and I note that their 3 point victory over northern iowa was not subject to the same logic.

Dropped like $30 on verizon overages watching from a campground in VA. Worth it though. Didn’t see first quarter but what struck me:

1. Cal poly played very conservatively but that is playing their strength (fullback Prothro). Aggie defensive scheme was spot on with personnel and alignment.
2. For the first time in a while the talent Chasm was quite large. UCD obviously had way more talent than Poly. It was like watching 2 levels of football. Run or pass was pick your poison for Poly. Yes the stats weren't That different but that was because of short fields etc. Never have been under less stress watching a game -and knowing there was virtually no way Ags would not win.

3. “Almost” felt sorry for Poly. Was weird seeing the 2 bands in the field together. When I was in band-uh they would not let us on field so we didn’t travel to their house - yet we didn’t reciprocate and they were in field at Toomey.

Yes, the Ags May lose in the coming weeks but if they pant anywhere near their potential they easily could run the table. Of course with 19 year olds and college football anything could happen. They are SO FUN to watch.

I am seriously thinking about going to Fargo next year. Could wend across the Midwest with wife and travel trailer and tailgate in Fargo.

I guess they couldn’t take that to North Dakota.

You beat me to it! LOL!

wow. That’s sounds a bit like Herm Edwards “you play to win the game”. Maybe they share 1/1024 in their blood line.

a metaphor is a terrible thing to waste. All I know is that the oven we have takes way too long to pre-heat.

Great explanation of all the things associated with stadium construction. Thanks for the education and logic. I had the opportunity to visit the new Texas A&M stadium a couple of years and listen to a presentation by one of the project managers. Very interesting technology used. They essentially demolished 1/2 of their old stadium in 2 consecutive years and had it ready about 1 week prior to the season both years. Of course it is A&M where they are pretty fanatical about their football and pretty sure donations are not an issue (or perhaps even endangered armadillos).

To me expansion doesn’t make a whole lot of sense until there is sufficient and consistent demand for seats. I think it is more exciting to watch a game in a full smaller stadium than in a sparsely filled bigger one. Every time I watch San Jose State on TV I ask myself “where are the fans”. It doesn’t seem possible that they have the 12,000 or so in attendance that is listed in the game stats. South Dakota State just redid their stadium - they seem to be more of a cohort/model.

need to schedule a game with Elon.

Correct, and rates have to do with capacity and number of applications. Stanford doesn’t have to do much marketing to get a whole lot of applicants so acceptance rate is going to be low.

Another wrinkle with the academic stats is that schools may have to accept 2 to yield 1, etc.

through Oct. 13
Scoring Offense: UCD 2nd in big sky 7th in nation (out of 125) 40.8
CPSU 11th in big sky 78th in nation 25. (Idaho State 1st BS at 41.3)

Scoring Defense: UCD 5th in big sky 69th in nation 30.5
CPSU 12th in big sky 106th in nation 38.8 (Weber 1st BS as 21.7)

Time of possession: UCD 9th in big sky 96th in nation 28.06 min.
CPSU. 1st in big sky and 4th in nation 34.41 min.

Last stat for random scatter discussion.

Demographics a bit different - enrollment ~12,000, state population ~750,000 and of course it is where "everyone is above average" - so yield will be higher.