Aggie women golfers are in fourth with 619 strokes after 36 holes in the first day of their own Gunrock Classic at Del Paso Country Club in Sacramento. Sac is in second with a score of 609. Windy weather was a factor as the Ag were the leaders after the first round, but struggled in the second. Action concludes with 18 holes tomorrow.

Also tomorrow the women host Sac in the home leg of this year’s softball competition.

Go Ags!

Got it, hope it didn't look like I was detracting from your point. Good to see that the Spartans respect the Ags. My point was that SJSU is an up and down team, as well as "on any given Saturday..."

Would love to see Davis beat them this fall, and point out to SC fans, (and detractors,) that the Trojans just paid alot for what looks like weaker competition, all for the sake of a label....then again things like pre-season previews are all just "what looks like."

(I bet last year both Arkansas and Army had their San Jose State game in the guaranteed column.)

Sac defeated the Aggies, 4-3, in a softball game at Sacramento today. Running score is now UCD 32.5, Sac 12.5. Next event is women's golf at the Gunrock Invitational to be played this coming Monday and Tuesday, March 2-3, at Del Paso CC in Sacramento. That will be the first of two women's golf meetings this season.

The return match of the home and away softball competition will be Tueday, March 3rd, in Davis.

The return match of the home and away gymnastics competition will be Friday, March 7th, in Sacramento.

7.5 points up for grabs next week.

Go Ags!

SJSU is an up and down team from year to year. Big road wins over Arkansas and Army last year were high points for the program, and they were competitive in their conference games. An Aggie win over the Spartans would be a real nice touch in any year, but it would be nice to beat them this coming year and then send a thank you note to the folks in Troy. And wouldn't the folks in Westwood and South Bend throw a couple of jabs at SC?

Go Ags!

This is all about labels. SJSU is D-1, FBS. UCD is D-1, FCS. USC faithful simply cannot bear the thought that they might have played an FCS school and the only two FBS schools that had never scheduled down are UCLA and Notre Dame.

Back in the Pete Carroll era I had family reasons to follow USC football. At one point there was a big chat-room banter that followed the USC vs LSU poll ratings. LSU and SEC fans pooh-poohed Pac 12 football and boasted that the only conference that really played football was the SEC. SC fans countered that SEC schools peppered their non-conference schedules with FCS/D1AA schools, and quite frankly, weak ones at that. They weren't scheduling the North Dakota States, James Madisons, etc. I think there were about five FBS schools at the time that had never scheduled FCS/1AA schools. Now it's down to three. This is a game of chicken and the first one to flinch loses. That's even tougher with the rivalries inherent in USC, UCLA, and Notre Dame.

Dunning's remarks about Ohio State, Michigan, Clemson, Oklahoma are good as far as they go, but if I recall when the UCD at USC game was announced USC claimed there were no FBS schools with an open date on Sept. 4, 2021. SJSU only became available when Clemson and Georgia scheduled a neutral site game and bought off their previously scheduled opponents. USC pounced on SJSU's availability. One wonders if someone at SJSU saw USC's need for an FBS opponent as leverage and squeezed some more money out of the deal.

Part of this, and something the new AD at SC mentioned earlier this year, was that USC had been adamant about playing home games. With the new PAC-12 scheduling, combined with an intersectional rivalry with UND, they are guaranteed 5 home games a year. WIth ten given games every season they now have two games to play with. They were unwilling to schedule teams home-and-away and insisted on home games with no reciprocal away game. A lot of teams balked at that. That "policy" will probably be changed.

Purely my $.02. I have no leads into the USC thought process.

Per this article USC is paying them $1.1M to play. And as already reported Georgia is paying them $1.8 not to play. $2.9M total for the weekend for the Spartans.

https://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/02/22/san-jose-state-taking-home-nearly-3-million-for-swapping-usc-with-georgia-in-2021/

"So removing us from the schedule cost $C about $2.6 Million?"

Or, as they call it at USC, "petty cash."

A couple of million dollars and a relatively good season last year should quiet rumors of the San Jose State football program's impending death.

It's official, or as official as these things can be, SC has added SJSU to its 2021 schedule.
https://usctrojans.com/news/2020/2/20/usc-trojans-football-future-schedules-san-jose-state-sdsu-spartans-uc-davis-aggies-2021.aspx

"The Spartans will receive a $1.8 million cancellation fee from Georgia plus their new guarantee from USC, which will likely be similar."

LA Times is reporting that USC might be trying to schedule San Jose State. Spartans were supposed to travel to Georgia, but Georgia and Clemson have agreed to a neutral site game that weekend, resulting in Georgia canceling their game with SJSU.
https://www.latimes.com/sports/usc/story/2020-02-19/usc-cancels-2021-matchup-in-football-with-uc-davis


And the Clemson v Georgia game also freed up Wyoming which had been scheduled to play Clemson. The Cowboys schedule now shows a game against Montana State for that date.

IF UNLV isn’t the undisclosed team that USC is trying to pick up for that date.

Yep, but there were protests about moving to D-I, and before that merging the NCAC into the CCAA because the CCAA played basketball on school nights, and....

Heck, having athletes that can find the classroom sets UCD apart from some places....

Not unusual that the education faculty and the athletic department have differences. We have experienced it for a LONG time at Davis.

An Aggie or a Gaucho? The team where you won a national championship and from which you left on your own terms? Or the team that fired you?

Re the emphasis on Nosek: note the article was written by former Enterprise sportswriter Bruce "Time of Possession" Gallaudet.

Order is restored and my OCD is in remission, Ags placed second in a quadrangular meet last night with 192.975 points while Sac placed third with 192.675. That gives UCD 2.5 points in the Causeway Cup to make the running score 32.5-10. Next schedule event, (I think,) is softball at Sacramento on February 26th.

A correction is in order. An earlier news release stated that the Causeway Cup meets for gymnastics would be January 5 at Sacramento and January 24th in Davis. (https://ucdavisaggies.com/news/2020/1/2/womens-gymnastics-uc-davis-gymnastics-opens-at-sac-state.aspx)

A more recent release (https://ucdavisaggies.com/news/2020/1/20/womens-gymnastics-uc-davis-returns-home-for-friday-quad-meet.aspx) and the Causeway Cup webpage (https://ucdavisaggies.com/sports/2019/8/9/2019-20-causeway-cup.aspx) say that the Cup points will be determined at the quadrangular meet in Davis on the 24th and at a dual meet in Sacramento on March 7th.

So we are at square one, with no gymnastic points awarded and the running score is 30-10. The Ags and Hornets will compete against each other at least six times this season. In two meetings thus far the Ags have defeated the Hornets both times.

I'm going out on a limb here, but I think his wife, Stacey, is a Sperbeck, and related to the former Sac State coach....but I could be wrong.

I'd always heard that he transferred because he "wanted to throw the ball." Mattos was the Sac coach and he had a running back named John Farley. Getting the ball to Farley and letting him run with it was a pretty good game plan. Farley was drafted by the Bengals in '84 and stuck around on the roster for one season.

It's official:
https://ucdavisaggies.com/news/2020/1/20/football-coombs-named-aggies-defensive-coordinator.aspx

First things first. Get the athletics into D-1 and FBS, then start funding for the library.